Man loses hands, so builds his own functioning bionic ones

This is remarkable and made news wires recently: A Chinese man builds a bomb to go blast fishing. It explodes unexpectedly and he loses his hands. He creates new ones for himself out of scrap metal.

Sun Jifa, 51, of Northern China, makes it all sound so simple. “I control them with movements from my elbows, and I can work, love normally and feed myself just like anyone else.”

There is, of course, a small drawback when your handiwork is made of scrap metal. It is very, very heavy. Sun admits that they can be tiring.

Still, he’s decided that he should now go into business helping others who cannot afford to buy the more expensive versions. Somebody needs to hook him into Kickstarter.

To me, this is a powerful example of two things:

1) Technology has incredible potential for radical social change-for-the-good, among those who can least afford it.

2) Technology can make heard the voices of geniuses we’d never hear from, because of the proliferation of communication and because of the ability of common people to lay hold on transformative technologies, especially open source tools.

This reminds me of a talk from Alex Tabarrok on how ideas trump crises. He argues free trade and globalization are shaping a world that is more interconnected and liberating for the poor and oppressed.

 

Advertisements

When I’m 164

https://i1.wp.com/ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41oyUn1CSiL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA278_PIkin4,BottomRight,-68,22_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpgI’ve observed a noticeable uptick in estimations of incredible life-extending miracles happening by 2050. “When I’m 164: The New Science of Radical Life Extension, and What Happens If It Succeeds” would seem to be Johnny-on-the-spot with this trend, and with the cool stamp of TED approval, but unfortunately fell a bit short for me.

Specifically, here’s how the book breaks down:

* 1/3 of the book was about the author’s question to people he encounters, and their answers, of why/why not do they want to grow exceptionally old.

* 1/3 of the book is end notes (musings about the author’s aging family, thanks yous, citations.)

* 17% centers directly on the book’s title: 1. Science of Radical Life Extension & 2. What Happens if it Succeeds. Unfortunately, some of these sections are only a few pages long. There are pages about stories & myths about aging, for some reason.

https://i1.wp.com/ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51oy5cOLhFL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA278_PIkin4,BottomRight,-52,22_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpgHybrid Reality: Thriving in the Emerging Human-Technology Civilization (TED Books) actually treated the topic better and is rich in information (albeit lacking a coherent thesis.)

Below is the specific content breakdown for When I’m 164. And, while not focusing on anti-aging, The Creative Destruction of Medicine: How the Digital Revolution Will Create Better Health Care looks like a good alternative to When I’m 164.